How It Works
Key Features List
Radmin Viewer
Radmin Server
IntelŽ AMT Features
Text and Voice Chat
Radmin vs Competitors
Radmin vs Remote Assistance
Radmin vs RealVNC
Radmin vs TeamViewer
Radmin vs pcAnywhere
Radmin vs DameWare
I read you will offer Radmin for free to people with disabilities. I highly commend you on this progressive action. I have a spinal cord injury resulting in paralysis and as a result spend a few more hours in bed than I would otherwise because I need people to help me to bed and if I stayed up as late as I wanted they would probably not help me! So, I go to bed with unfinished computer business but with Radmin I can keep working on my desktop from my laptop as long as I want. This has helped me immensely. Radmin is so stable and it's the best solution I have used for remote access. I look forward to further improvements I read about on your support section. Personally, I will happily continue to pay for Radmin because I can but I know others less able to do so than me will really appreciate your action.
Garry Bartsch



Radmin vs Competitors


What do you expect from a remote control program? Comfortable remote work! This is possible with good image quality without corruptions and minimal screen lag.

Among the variety of remote control software solutions that offer similar functionality the choice should be made by comparing the performance and image quality parameters.

Product namePerformanceImage qualityOverallsWatch video comparison

Radmin 3.2

Remote Assistance888Radmin vs Remote Assistance
Symantec pcAnywhere 12.0645Radmin vs pcAnywhere
DameWare vs DameWare
RealVNC 4.3.1264Radmin vs RealVNC
TeamViewer 3.3.4437132Radmin vs TeamViewer


Comparative Test Description


The test comparing Radmin remote control against a selection of competitors has been carried out at the test laboratory of Famatech company.

The server components were installed on one computer (Computer A) and client components on a second computer (Computer B). Computers were connected together on an isolated network to eliminate the possible influence of incidental factors. The software was configured to display the screen of remote Computer A on the client Computer B. On Computer B screen capture software was started capturing operations initiated by a special script.

The following operations were chosen for this test: Opening Display Properties window, Screen Saver preview, Browsing contents of the Wallpapers folder with Windows Picture Viewer.

The conditions of the test


The speed tests were performed on an ethernet 100Mb LAN using the following systems:

Computer A (remote):
  • OS: Windows XP Pro 64-bit SP 1
  • Screen: 800*600, 16 bit colors
  • Memory: 1024 MB DDR2
  • CPU: Intel Pentium D 2.80GHz
  • Video: NVIDIA GeForce 7300 GS, 256MB

Computer B (host):
  • OS: Windows XP Pro 32-bit SP 2
  • Screen: 1024*768, 16 bit colors
  • Memory: 3.24 GB DDR2
  • CPU: Intel Core2 Duo 2.33GHz
  • Video: NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS, 512MB

Free fully functional 30-day trial
Famatech Corporation Copyright © 1999-2014 Famatech. All rights reserved.